Skip to main content
Open Doubt
Tradition

Religion and societal harm in Islam

The argument that religion causes distinctive social harm reaches its sharpest form in contemporary critiques of political Islam — from ex-Muslim dissidents like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Ibn Warraq to Muslim reformers like Irshad Manji and Maajid Nawaz.

The societal-harm critique of religion reaches one of its sharpest forms in contemporary discussion of political Islam. The case, made by ex-Muslim dissidents and critical Western commentators, runs: blasphemy and apostasy laws still carry the death penalty in several Muslim-majority states; women's legal status remains subordinate under sharia-based family law in many jurisdictions; religiously motivated terrorism has, at certain points in the last half-century, been disproportionately Islamist in origin; and public discussion of these facts is itself chilled by accusations of Islamophobia and by literal threats of violence (the Rushdie fatwa, the Charlie Hebdo murders, the Theo van Gogh killing).

The most influential voices in this literature are themselves former Muslims. Ayaan Hirsi Ali's Infidel (2007) and Heretic (2015) lay out the argument from the inside; Ibn Warraq's Why I Am Not a Muslim (1995) is a rationalist critique in the tradition of Bertrand Russell. Neither treats Muslim people as the problem — the argument is about doctrine, institutions, and incentives. Sam Harris's The End of Faith (2004) extends this into a secular-liberal argument that Western progressive politics has failed Muslim reformers by treating criticism of Islamic doctrine as taboo.

Muslim reformers make overlapping points. Irshad Manji's The Trouble with Islam Today (2003) argues for ijtihad — independent reasoning — against centuries of scholastic lockdown. Maajid Nawaz's Radical (2012) tells his path from Hizb ut-Tahrir to counter-extremism work. Critics like John Esposito and Reza Aslan argue that the harm-critique flattens Islam's internal diversity, cherry-picks episodes of violence while ignoring centuries of coexistence, and conflates political movements with theological essence. The debate remains among the most politically charged in contemporary discussion of religion — one where the question 'does this tradition cause distinctive harm?' has real costs for real people on every answer.

Key figures
Key quotes

When people tell you you are not allowed to ask, the question becomes more urgent, not less.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Heretic (2015)

Continue exploring

Ask anything